| Introduction
Growing up we are taught a wide variety of subjects that have contributed
to the overall advancement and knowledge of our known world. We are taught
the histories of the once great civilizations of ancient times from Mesopotamia
through the Egyptians and the Romans. We learn about their culture, mythology,
beliefs and scientific advancements over a given time span, most of which
has been gathered by endless archaeological research. We also are taught
our own modern scientific curriculum, most of which has been contributed
by and evolved from the ancient sciences. Subjects such as chemistry for
example, had once split and evolved from Alchemy in the late 1700s. Geometry
as we know it today still uses the same principles taught within the initiated
Mystery Schools of the ‘Old World’ (Mesopotamia, Egypt ,etc),
which were once considered to be a secret philosophy. The same goes for
physics and many other subjects being taught in our schools today.
The empirical science of today is seen as almost infallible in every way
possible. It progresses within its own terms by constantly reevaluating,
questioning and reassessing itself. However, what happens when we stop
taking into account alternatives or new systematic directions? The modern
scientific model ceases to truly progress. Throughout history scientists
ranging from Galileo Galilei to Isaac Newton to Albert Einstein have developed
ideas that totally revolutionized the world as we know it. And with such
‘radical’ and ‘revolutionary’ ideas come just
as much opposition to prevent changing the institutional standards or
views. With that in mind, we must shift our focus to the most crucial
and critically basic subject that helps better our understanding of the
world as we know it- our history. Through the scientific field of archaeology
we have gathered together our historical conceptual view of our history
as we know it. And thus, like any other science it becomes taught to us
through texts books, media, and so forth growing up through the educational
system. But what if our westernized view of history is radically different
from the truth? We must take into account all forms of conceptual history
and apply them to our own. For example, in most cultures history is seen
as circular and not linear. In other cultures mythology is not seen as
mere fantasy but rather symbolic and very real. Within the realm of science
today we get pre-conceived ideas that everything must be either/or and
nothing can be the alternative. Either you’re a democrat or republican,
either you believe in creationism or evolution. Over time we start to
lose alternatives and a sense of reality, because most of the world is
not black or white (despite what many may think). The science of today
tries to define everything as clearly into categories as possible, leaving
little-to-no room for the ‘grey areas’. However, any one in
today’s world clearly knows that these gray areas make up most of
the world of today. The empirical scientific institutions of today must
take into account different alternatives and conceptual points of views
so as to evolve and ‘perfect itself’ as a field the best it
can. Or else the institutional systems of today will become just as flawed
as the Roman Catholic authority became in the past.
From the Realm of Myth into Reality
Myths have been around since the dawn of humanity with deep-seated meaning
behind each myth. Parallel myths ring out throughout various cultures
spanning the globe telling of forgotten places, ethical/moral conduct,
and deep psychological representations of the psyche at work. Joseph Campbell
best described this during his interview with Bill Moyers, which has been
published in a book entitled The Power of Myth (1988). In his interview
Campbell described how myths are still around today, in various forms,
and how we have totally disregarded the meaningful application of myth
within our modern context. Joseph Campbell gives a simple definition for
what myths are; “Myths are clues to the spiritual potentialities
of the human life” (Campbell 1988: 5). Myths are meaningful mysteries
for each of us to decipher, to apply inwards and perhaps to our general
understanding of our world.
In the 1870s Heinrich Schliemann, who had grown up hearing myths of ancient
cities and wars, actually searched for the legendary city of Troy. At
the time Troy was considered nothing more than a myth; however, Heinrich
Schliemann went searching for it despite harsh criticism and indeed ended
up finding Troy by pure coincidence. Imagine if such enthusiasm and effort
was applied within the realm of science of today, what things we could
discover. He was not a certified archaeologist by any means and yet discovered
something on such a grand scale.
In contrast to the story of Heinrich Schliemann is Eugène Dubois,
who was educated as a scientist. In 1891 he discovered what was known
as ‘Java Man’ which was considered the missing link, which
consisted of a skullcap, a femur, and a few teeth. At the time there was
a scientific need to find the missing link so as to prove Darwin’s
Theory of Evolution. It was interesting to note that the skullcap and
femur were found more than 40 feet away from each other, which led him
to conclude that they were of the same creature-which he dubbed ‘Java
Man.’ “The important point to make about the Java Man discover
is that its based on a speculative leap in which two pieces of evidence
are put together in way that is not really warranted” said Dr. Richard
L. Thompson in the 1996 NBC documentary The Mysterious Origins of Man.
Before Eugène Dubois’s death he realized that the skullcap
belonged to a large ape and the leg bone was that of a man, despite this
fact it was proudly displayed in the Museum of Natural History in New
York until 1984 when it was removed.
According to many cultures from around the world there seems to be a predominant
theme that humans did not evolve but yet were created as is. This is self
evident within Vedic, Navajo, Hopi, Mayan, Biblical and even Egyptian
lore. Should we then reassess the very foundations of Darwinism? Or should
we take into account other possibilities? It is interesting that Heinrich
Schliemann was not considered an archaeologist until after his discovery,
and yet Eugène Dubois was always considered a leading archaeologist
despite his flawed discovery of the ‘missing link.’
A good example of a parallel myth is that of the world-wide flood. The
accounts of a Great Flood have its origins in the Mesopotamian epic of
Gilgamesh, the Biblical tale of Noah, and even the Sumerian tale of Ziusudra.
Although we are familiar with those stories, we don’t take into
account that almost every Native American tribe has its own version of
the Great Flood. How could this be? When the Spanish ventured forth converting
the Native Americans they made this realization, that they too had their
own version of the Great Flood.
In the Native Mount Shasta culture, for example, there seems to be a strong
belief (as well as many of other tribes up through Washington state) that
there was once a race of ‘animal people’ as they call them.
The following story is taken from the neighboring Shasta tribes on their
version of the great flood (which was recorded by Joaquin Miller). Once
Coyote was traveling around, carrying his bow and arrows with him. He
then approached a body of water, where an evil spirit dwelled. Upon seeing
him the evil sprit said that there was “no wood”, and then
caused the water to over flow the land. Once the water went down, Coyote
got up, shot the evil spirit and ran off. But the water followed him until
he reached higher ground. All the way to the top of Mount Shasta the Coyote
ran, and the water didn’t quite make it to the top. Coyote then
built a fire, and over a period of days many different animals swam to
Coyote. All the animal people stayed on top of Mount Shasta until the
flood was over. Once the water level went down it left a series of lakes
and marshes, and the animal people came down to rebuild their homes. They
scattered everywhere and became the ancestors of all the animal people
on the earth.
It is to be noted that during the Late Pleistocene (126,000 ± 5,000
years ago) the sea levels were hundreds of feet lower than they were today
due to the glaciers. And by the end of the Late Pleistocene, the glaciers
(which covered most of the northern hemisphere) melted away, but could
it be possible that a massive amount of glacier melted so quickly that
it could have cause a world-wide flood? Or perhaps even Plato’s
tale of Atlantis being swept overnight by violent quakes and flood could
have taken place during this time?
Opposing Evidence
On July 28, 1996 a few boating enthusiasts tried to get close to a boat
show that was taking place on the Columbia River near Kennewick Washington,
they soon found something sticking out of the eroded river bank. On closer
inspection they realized that they were skeletal remains. Soon thereafter
Forensic Scientists came in to investigate and to their surprise turned
out that the remains dated back to around 9,000 BC (Swedlund & Anderson
1999). In 1959, archaeologists on Santa Rosa Island California discovered
skeletal remains dating back to 10,000BC and nearby signs of stool tools
which date back 12,500 to 29,700BCE (Orr 1962). What makes these skeletons
so interesting is that they do not really match up with the Bering Strait
Land Bridge Theory, which is when the first Native Americans are said
to have crossed across from Asia into North America. There is also something
else that makes these two skeletons unique, besides being some of the
oldest skeletons found, they are considered to have “Caucasian”
features (quite similar to the indigenous Caucasian race of Ainu in Japan).
On January 10th, 2007 a London-based newspaper reported an amazing find
in the middle of the Amazon. 82 feet below the surface they uncovered
a burial vault containing Caucasian mummies. They are known as the Chachapoyas,
which is a name given to them by their conquerors the Inca, meaning ‘Cloud-People’.
When the Spanish ventured through the Americas in the 1500s they came
across many “strange white Indians” with beards. There have
also been Caucasian skeletons found in Alaska and eastern parts of Asia
some even with distinct red hair. There was even a Roman account by Pliny
in Seres (once the northwestern territories of China) to Emperor Claudius
(10BC- 54AD) saying that people there “exceeded the ordinary human
height, had flaxen hair, and blue eyes, and made an uncouth sort of noise
by way of talking”.
Again, by analyzing the parallel myths and legends we find there is a
common story to be told. According to many indigenous people across Polynesian
islands, throughout many indigenous Native American tribes to Tibet and
Indian esoteric teachings there are stories of a once great civilization/continent
which once existed in what is today the Pacific Ocean. Known by different
names such as Mu, Lemuria, Hiva, and Hawaikia the great civilization (supposedly
before Atlantis) had a great cataclysm that caused the continent to gradually
sink to the bottom of the Ocean. Off the coast of Yonaguni, Japan they
found ruins spreading throughout the Ocean floor, there is still a lot
of archaeological debate going on presently towards is being linked to
a lost civilization (Joseph 2006: 306-320). On Santa Rosa Island there
are also unique Flora and Fauna which is not found anywhere else in the
world (Moody 2000), could Santa Rosa Island have once been a part of this
great continent? It is also interesting to note that during the 16th century
when Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo ventured through these islands off
the coast of California he notes in his captains log that the indigenous
Chumash women as having “fine forms, beautiful eyes and a modest
demeanor” and the children as being “white, with light hair
and ruddy cheeks” (Heizer & Whipple 1972: 273). These Channel
Islanders were even classified as “proto-Caucasoid” by Dr.
Jeffery Goodman who extensively studied human crania and states that modern
man may have occupied southern California up to 500,000 years ago (Goodman
1981: 178-191).
Where do we separate the supposed myth from fact? Perhaps it is not as
easy as we could imagine. When the Spanish first ventured through the
Americas they went in search of ‘El Dorado’ and the mysterious
cities of gold. They were told legends in California, which they thought
was once an island, about a mysterious and beautiful Empress who ruled
over the whole of the island who came from a lost land. In 1510 Garcí
Ordóñez de Montalvo wrote ‘The Exploits of Esplandián’,
which was a fictional novel about an Amazonian Empress named Queen Califa
who ruled over an island (Reynolds 1998). The Spanish probably made the
correlation between the fictional novel and Native American legend and
thus California was born. According to the indigenous Yurok of northern
California (a few miles from Mount Shasta), they proclaim before their
ancestors inhabited the Klamath River, there were white-skinned people
who occupied the land. And who were considered very moral, civilized and
even shared what little they possessed with the Yurok. They were known
as Wa-gas, meaning literally “white person” (Thompson 1991:
81-87). Even well known anthropologist Alfred L. Kroeber recorded stories
regarding these ancient people from the Yurok, spelled also wo’gey
and also known as the ikhareyev to the Karok and kixunai to the Hupa.
Perhaps their physical remnants lay within the obscure collections of
a museum in California or Nevada? Truth be known, there are physical remains
of these ancient people within various museums and the question is then
asked, why haven’t we heard about this?
Anomalous Archaeological Evidence
In 1998 Michael A. Cremo, and Richard L. Thompson released a 914 page
book entitled ‘Forbidden Archaeology’ which consist of hundreds
upon hundreds of anomalous artifacts that seem to tell a different story
of mankind. These are carefully documented cases in which certain artifacts
seem to point to a different story than Darwin’s evolutionary model
states. Skeletons dating back as far as 280-320 million years ago, hundreds
of documented primitive eoliths, a gold chain dating back 260-320 million
years ago, a metal vase dating up to 600 million years ago, to even odd
metallic grooved spheres found in Ottosdalin South Africa dating to 2800
million years ago in the Precambrian Era (Cremo & Thompson 1994: 267-279)
.
A well-documented case study is that of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County,
in California. Several mines were dug into a huge plateau in order to
uncover possible gold and other mineral resources. 180 feet below the
surface they uncovered a morter and pestle. Investigators were called
into to date the artifacts and were quite astonished to reveal that they
dated back between 33 and 55 million years. Every possible explanation
to debunk this artifacts were all inconclusive, in other words there is
no reasonable explanation for these artifacts to have ended up there.
Among other artifacts found were those of human skeletal remains (Cremo
& Thompson 1994: 94-101).
In a recently published book the now well-known and well-respected archaeologists
are coming forward to state up front that yes, there is a great injustice
taking place within the field of archaeology. The book is called ‘The
First American; The Suppressed Story of the People who Discovered the
New World’ by Christopher Hardaker. In Vaslsequillo, Mexico they
have uncovered some of the oldest spearheads in the world. Harvard University
started to investigate closely along side of the United States Geological
Survey geologists. Their first estimates were thought to be around 12,000
years old, and was considered to be the ‘official date’. But
the archaeologists estimated that it could be 40,000 years old, which
is 3 times as much of the official date. However, after USGS geologists
and researchers came in, they dated the remains to be 250,000 years old!
Among the things recovered lays a mastodon bone with detailed carved depictions
of various animals dating further back than the Pleistocene era. Because
many of the dates from the site are considered to be ‘too ridiculously
old’ they were put aside. Afterwards, the site was blocked off to
prevent any further investigation. Two questions are then asked; Why is
all this evidence being ignored? And second, how long have humans really
been inhabiting the Americas?
The forward to Christopher Hardaker’s book was written by Charles
Naeser, a geochemist, of the United States Geological Survey who stated
the following.
"As a scientist I am embarrassed that it has taken over 30 years
for archaeologists and geologists to revisit the bone and artifact deposits
of Valsequillo Reservoir. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, data were
presented that suggested Early Man had been in the New World much earlier
than anyone had previously thought. Rather than further investigate the
discoveries, which is what should have been done, they were buried under
the sands of time, in the hope that they would be forgotten. Now we have
at least five independent geological age estimates that all indicate an
old, pre-Clovis age for the Valsequillo site. We have the choice of accepting
the results as correct and concluding that the artifacts are greater than
200,000 years old or arguing that there is something significantly wrong
with each of the geological age estimates."
Retrospect
There seems to be now a sort of ‘knowledge filter’ put within
the realm of institutional science. No more room for reevaluation of the
standards put into place by our system. On one hand you have the logical
and educated scientist who is lecturing on the theories put in place by
Darwin, and on the other hand you have the bible-loathing Christians preaching
creationism, both being like different sides of the same coin. There have
been recent studies that have been published, by well respected scientists,
in regards to Darwin’s theory of Evolution. Dr. Aaron G. Filler,
M.D., Ph.D., a well known neurosurgeon, has collected support from various
leading Biologists and Anthropologists supporting a new alternative take
to Darwin’s theory. In his recently published book, The Upright
Ape: A New Origin of the Species, through rigorous analysis and investigations
he, and several other people, conclude that if anything apes evolved from
humans from a common upright ancestor! Imagine the implications within
our institutional views if this turned out to be true, we would have to
completely restructure our whole preconceived views of our history as
a human species.
There is a growing fear of Eurocentrism, which is view that European people
are the superior culture. And when it comes to cases such as the Arlington
Springs Woman, and Kennewick Man many people are in fear of this supporting
that white people are somehow more superior then the Natives, and to the
point that they were the first ones to reach the Americas. This dangerous
ideology is very much flawed, be it through ‘institutional racism’
or some other factor, we must acknowledge and understand the fact that
we, as a human species, are all one and the same. Despite our various
physical looks, and inherent traits we are all very much one and the same.
Many of the findings, as mentioned before, have been pushed aside and
dismissed through various means. But many archaeologists are also in fear
of being ‘blacklisted’. A prime example of this is Dr. Virginia
Steen-McIntyre, who in 1966 had discovered sophisticated stone tools dating
back as far as 20,000 years old in Mexico. The USGS was brought in to
date the site, and several of the artifacts were sent to labs to undergo
analysis. The results clearly showed they were about 20,000 years old.
Once the data was collected, she sent in the results to get published.
She was ridiculed because of her statements, lost her job and hasn’t
been able to find another within the same field of archaeology ever since.
She was in a sense ‘blacklisted’ because of her work and there
are many cases in which this is true, that is why you have many scientists
being careful of what the say in order to prevent loosing their reputation.
Conclusion
So to conclude I must directly urge people to investigate the information
for themselves and to avoid listening to biased opinions over the given
matters. Science is a field in which must continue to progressively question
itself in order to improve its ideals, and structure in order to have
a more perfect and clear representation of reality. Certain theories have
been made in the past given with the assumption that within the next few
years there would have been discoveries to fully support and conclude
the theories. However, like in the case with the missing link, the theory
must deliver that piece of archaeological evidence to make it complete.
But, because we have yet to discover such a piece of evidence, the theory
should become a thing of dispute, though it is quite the opposite. It
has now then been internalized as law. We must continue to reevaluate
our progressive measures in order to ensure a more accurate portrayal
of history. And if we do not, then we become just like any other corrupt
institution of power (politically and of education) that has been and
will always continue to be until we break the cycle.
Bibliography
Campbell, Joseph
1988 The Power of Myth. New York: Broadway Books
Cremo, Michael A. & Thompson, Richard L.
1994 The Hidden History of the Human Race. California: Govardhan Hill
Publishing
Cremo, Michael A. & Thompson, Richard L.
1998 Archeology: The Full Unabridged Edition. California: Govardhan Hill
Publishing
Filler, Dr. Aaron G.
2007 The Upright Ape: A New Origin of the Species. New Jersey: The Career
Press
Goodman, Jeffrey Ph.D.
1981 American Genesis. New York: Summit Books
Hardaker, Christopher
2007 The First American: The Suppressed Story of the People who Discovered
the New World. New Jersey: The Career Press
Heizer, Robert F. & Whipple, Mary Anne
1972 The California Indians: A Source Book. California: University of
California Press
Heston, Charlton and Cote, Bill
1996 The Mysterious Origins of Man: Rewriting Man's History. B. C. Video
Inc. NBC Broadcasting
Joseph, Frank (edited)
2006 Discovering the Mysteries of Ancient America: Lost History and Legends,
Unearthed and Explored. New Jersey: The Career Press
Joseph, Frank
2006 The Lost Civilization of Lemuria: The Rise and Fall of the World’s
Oldest Culture. Vermont: Bear & Company
Keyon, J. Douglas
2005 Forbidden History. Vermont: Bear & Company
Moody, Aaron
Analysis of Plant Species Diversity with Respect to Island Characteristics
on the Channel Islands, California. Journal of Biogeography.Vol. 27, No.
3 (May, 2000), pp. 711-723
Orr, Phil C.
Arlington Springs Man. Science Magazine. New Series, Vol. 135, No. 3499
(Jan., 1962), p. 219
Reynolds, Jerry
1998 History of the Santa Clarita Valley Electronic document, http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/signal/reynolds/part06.html
Swedlund, Alan & Anderson, Duane
Gordon Creek Woman Meets Kennewick Man: New Interpretations and Protocols
Regarding the Peopling of the Americas. American Antiquity. Vol. 64, No.
4 (Oct., 1999), pp. 569-576
This is London News
2007 Moment 600 years ago that terror came to Mummies of the Amazon. Electronic
document, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23381234-details/Moment+600+years+ago+that+terror+came+to+Mummies+of+the+Amazon/article.do
Thompson, Lucy
1991 To the American Indian: Reminiscences of a Yurok Woman. California:
Heyday Books
|